VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA ****
Love is a hard road. Sex only complicates things further. There is no reprieve in this life where matters of the heart are concerned.
Just endless questions with no definitive answers.
VICKY (REBECCA HALL) and CRISTINA (SCARLETT JOHANSSON) are two young American women who are more than vaguely aware of this particular puzzle. They decide to spend their summer vacationing in Spain.
Vicky (an attractive brunette) is the sensible realist. She’s engaged to DOUG (SIX FEET UNDER’S CHRIS MESSINA), a decent guy who cherishes her and shares her conservative values. On the surface, he would appear to be her perfect man. They have a comfortable caring relationship. Vicky is only vaguely aware that there might be something missing.
Cristina is a vibrant hothouse wild flower. She is the uninhibited romantic that dreams of passion but instinctively knows the lay of the land. She’s open to a variety of different experiences and situations – and with her provocative figure, smoky voice and magnificent mane of blonde hair, she won’t ever go unnoticed or unappreciated. She is impulsive but she won’t settle for less than she deserves.
Cristina is not effortlessly swept away by just anyone. She is an aspiring filmmaker/actor who longs for meaning, both professionally and personally. Yet she remains restless and perpetually dissatisfied.
The girls adore Barcelona. It’s a gorgeous glittering city filled with exquisite architecture and incredible culture.
One evening they’re having a drink at a local restaurant when a handsome painter that they previously noticed at an art gallery arrives to join them.
JUAN ANTONIO (JAVIER BARDEM) tells them that they’re both very beautiful and desirable. He invites them to journey to another Spanish town and spend the weekend with him there. If they’re agreeable, he promises several days of talking, drinking, eating, sightseeing…and great sex.
Unsurprisingly, Vicky becomes offended and rather hostile while Cristina is deeply intrigued. But Juan Antonio is neither a liar nor a user. He isn’t out to hurt anyone deliberately and he genuinely adores women. “Life is dull, short, full of pain. Why not enjoy it while you can?”
He was married to the love of his life, MARIA ELENA (PENELOPE CRUZ). She’s also an artist. She’s sexy, wild, gloriously temperamental…and completely unstable. As he explains, “We are meant for each other AND not meant for each other.” It was a passion so grand, intense and exquisitely brutal that he knows without question that it could never be duplicated.
Besides, she tried to kill him.
At this stage, Juan Antonio wants to spend his time distracting himself with any lovely female that suits him at the moment. He’s open to endless possibilities. Nothing is carved in stone. But he’s all ready had the ultimate experience. He and Maria Elena are fated to make up and break up eternally.
Vicky is completely opposed to the idea. She’s engaged and she’s not going. But Cristina is interested. She won’t guarantee that anything physical will happen. But life is all about seizing the day. Juan Antonio is the first man that she’s been drawn to since she arrived.
Vicky finally agrees to accompany Cristina. She doesn’t want her to get in any trouble. They depart in Juan Antonio’s plane. They spend the day together and then he asks the women back to his room.
Vicky goes off to her own suite but Cristina tells Juan Antonio that she’ll come up as long as he agrees to seduce her. He heartily agrees. They begin kissing and caressing. Before anything can happen, Cristina’s ulcer begins to bother her and she falls ill. The doctor provides Cristina with medicine and orders her to rest for the remainder of the weekend.
Vicky and Juan Antonio are left to their own devices. They begin spending time together in Cristina’s absence and Vicky finds herself warming to the soulful Spaniard. She realizes she enjoys his company a great deal and discovers that she was wrong about him.
Of course her initial extreme reaction was due to the fact that she was intensely attracted to him immediately and couldn’t deal with that fact. Before they leave the hotel – in an entirely spontaneous moment – Juan Antonio and Vicky sleep together.
Back on their own again several days later, Cristina gets invited out by Juan Antonio. Vicky is far more sensitive than she allows people to realize. She says nothing to Cristina. But the pain is enormous. Cristina begins a romance with Juan Antonio and eventually moves in with him while Vicky remains endlessly melancholy.
During two meetings, Juan Antonio clarifies things with Vicky. He tells her that things between them just got out of control. He wanted her sincerely but he was developing a destructive attachment to her. She has a life and a serious boyfriend that she intends to marry. He could never compete with that or want to get in the middle of that situation. Her choice has all ready been made. Later, he makes it abundantly clear that he’s now with Cristina and he intends to honour that.
Vicky attempts to think things through. She’s going through a huge emotional crisis. But Juan Antonio is no longer available to her. Despondent and unhappy, she talks to Doug about the future. (But not about her steamy weekend.) Doug wants to come to Barcelona. She agrees and they get married there.
Then Maria Elena overdoses. She loses her job, her boyfriend, her home….EVERYTHING. Juan Antonio insists that Maria Elena stay with him and Cristina until she recovers. It will only be for a few months.
Things are just starting to get interesting….
WOODY ALLEN is, of course, one of the best writer/directors in the history of film. He particularly excels at the compelling allure and great difficulty of modern relationships. In VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA he illuminates all of the unalterable truths and complete cliches regarding soulmates, lovers and living together and turns them into sublime poetry witnessed on the glorious golden streets of a luscious European metropolis.
He has also found an entirely new style and for that he should be commended. From the first film that he directed (TAKE THE MONEY & RUN) right up until MELINDA & MELINDA, a WOODY ALLEN film was a completely recognizable entity regardless of genre.
Like MATCH POINT, the action is set overseas. From that juncture, any of his films could conceivably have come from a fresh new talent. To completely reinvent yourself as a filmmaker after 35 years (and to inspire a decided break with tradition) is a remarkable feat in a long list of achievements that Mr. Allen has perfected. It is, at the very least, an extraordinarily impressive and unusual accomplishment.
He is working with a breathtaking palette of rich new colours.
The actors are all excellent. But the standouts are Mr. Bardem and Ms. Cruz. They have exceptional chemistry with each other. But they are both wonderful as two stunningly sensual Europeans – one who is determined to taste life and live it to the fullest and the other bent on destroying herself and everyone else in the process.
This film is about all the situations that we know so well: loves fought for and lost, dreams shattered, a tiny ray of hope that blossoms slowly and then disappears forever.
Relationships are nonsensical, difficult, challenging and utterly maddening. There are few pleasures more exquisite when a romantic interaction is going well. (Sexual and otherwise.) But there are definite risks that never go away.
Why keep trying? Largely because physical and emotional needs are unstoppable forces that can not be denied. To reconcile yourself to a life entirely alone is not much of a solution – and there is always hope.
But in an unstable, sometimes cruel heartless world, what choices are available? People will continue longing, yearning, searching. There will never be an end to that restlessness.
It’s all encompassing and unending. As inevitable as the sunrise.
The quest for love is eternal. Even though it never lasts.
VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA amply illustrates all of those principles.
It is the best Woody Allen film in years.

August 18, 2008 at 1:56 pm
Wow. Can’t wait to see this.
I know you’re as big a fan of Woody’s as me, so that’s good news…
August 18, 2008 at 3:14 pm
I am thrilled to hear you loved it.
I cannot wait to see it.
August 18, 2008 at 3:17 pm
Yeah, we both adore Woody. That is something that can not be denied.
Christian, I’m going to go out on a limb and say that you’re really going to like this. AT THE VERY LEAST.
You and I both write…and you write screenplays. So I’m sure that you’re aware of how difficult it is to create compelling multifaceted characters from the ground up. He’s done that here. IN SPADES.
It’s exquisitely subtle and believable.
There are no good guys or bad guys. Even MARIA ELENA (who’s frankly a little nuts) has no actual bad intentions. They’re just people (albeit more outwardly glamourous and wealthy than the norm) who are attempting to be happy the best way they know how.
But life keeps getting in the way…
If people don’t like this film, then I think it’s because they’re expecting a more conventional romance with a happy ending tacked on. It’s not tragic. AT ALL.
But it’s very realistic.
You know that saying, We make plans and God laughs? Like that. (Well. Woody’s an atheist. But you know what I mean… )
It illuminates all of these truths in a beautiful poetic manner. It has bright bursts of comedy but I’d categorize it as more of a drama.
This just occurred to me, actually. I bet all the people that were enraptured by MY BLUEBERRY NIGHTS (as few as there were… ) will eat this up with a spoon too. Just my take on the whole deal.
I wanted to stick something in the review about boats against the current or the green light at the end of the dock, but I’m not F. Scott. I’ll quote him when I’m not writing anything original.
Gotta stand on principle.
Thanks for coming over, you blue eyed boy. You have been missed…
August 18, 2008 at 3:26 pm
Don’t know what you’ll think, Nicky.
I’ve seen them all. EXCEPT for CASSANDRA’S DREAM, which didn’t play here.
I haven’t loved a WOODY ALLEN movie this much since CELEBRITY and I only gave that three stars. I’d give HUSBANDS & WIVES five and ALICE four. So you’d have to go back a long way to get a rating like that from me.
Frankly, I haven’t been crazy about many of his films since this decade began. But now I’m feeling wonderfully hopeful.
Says a lot that a guy (even someone as brilliant as he is) can totally reinvent himself with a brand new approach at this stage of the game.
That’s bloody well intoxicating.
When you see it, honey, I do hope that you dig it.
August 19, 2008 at 12:09 am
Thanks, pal.
Well, I write and I’ve read a lot of the greats extensively. You definitely have a gift, Evan. So it’s wonderful that you’re not turning your back on something that you were so clearly born to do.
Lots of people never make that leap.
Truthfully, the VO annoyed the hell out of me. But only for the first five or ten minutes. Unless he was a friend of someone’s though I have no idea why they chose that guy.
He certainly wasn’t mellifluous or soothing to listen to. Not that everyone has to be JAMES EARL JONES. But he really wasn’t any fun. After a short period of that, I just ignored him and paid attention to my own impressions. Ha ha. He wasn’t telling me anything I didn’t know anyway.
As for the NEWSWEEK interview, WOODY has always been like that. Some of his characters (like the guy in HANNAH & HER SISTERS, for example) have grappled with faith and religion. But I honestly don’t know if he EVER has.
WOODY is not an agnostic. He’s a full blown atheist. I’m someone that’s always had spirtual leanings and I’m a great believer in faith. So it’s difficult for me to understand that point of view.
There are so many odd coincidences and wonderful things that happen to people, how can you not think that there’s something? Yeah, I know there are some horrible random things that happen to individuals as well.
But I honestly believe that there is a reason for everything that happens. You can’t always understand it at the time. I think most things inevitably work out for the best. When you’re in the middle of it, it can seem like hell. But years later when you look back and realize the road you could’ve taken (that would’ve been a complete and utter disaster), yeah…
If you see BARBARA KOPPLE’S doc WILD MAN BLUES, it’s obvious that WOODY has had some difficulties with depression. That likely accounts for the extreme pessimism.
His parents (who were interviewed along with him) were difficult people. They may have loved him but it’s obvious that they gave him no encouragement and didn’t think that he was accomplishing anything worthwhile.
Here their son is the idol of millions, rich, famous, influential and they act like it’s nothing and treat him like a kid at school who knows diddly. Must have been pretty rough on the self esteem.
WOODY definitely has the attitude that this world is a miserable place where horrible things happen. So of course there is no God.
I don’t buy that and I have my own theories. But that is what he believes.
I’m not a hopeful person or an optimist. But I think that (aside from work) that this life is to be enjoyed. As long as you’re a responsible human being and you don’t hurt anyone else, I think you’re entitled.
You have to make your own fun, you know?
He has embraced joy and optimism in HANNAH & HER SISTERS and EVERYONE SAYS I LOVE YOU. But maybe he was going through a phase.
WOODY has a rather unique view of life. He has always expressed opinions on various subjects that I couldn’t relate to or that I felt were surprising.
He’s never going to change. So you may as well love him for who he is.
He’s a brilliant writer and a great director. He’s endlessly self critical (who wouldn’t be with those parents?) but this world would have missed him if he hadn’t arrived here.
August 18, 2008 at 5:27 pm
I too am a Woody Allen fan and I have my favourites (ANNIE HALL, MANHATTAN, HANNAH & HER SISTERS, BULLETS OVER BROADWAY, as well as the more recent HUSBANDS & WIVES).
I love everyone in the cast of VCB, and have the full hope that Mr. Allen restores my dwindling faith in his recent capabilities, because although I will always revere him as a colossal cinematic force of brilliance, he has let me down in recent times more than he should have.
At least more than I ever thought he could’ve.
August 19, 2008 at 3:20 am
That’s kind of sad about Woody and his parents. That kind of stuff will eat away at your soul like battery acid. It’s scary the influence and control our parents can exert over us even if they’re dead or live a thousand miles away.
August 18, 2008 at 8:40 pm
Nicky, I ADORE all of the films you mentioned above except BOB.
I think that WOODY has made some decent motion pictures this century (to start) and a few good ones. But it doesn’t amount to very much compared to some of the astounding work that he did from the 70s right through the 90s.
I think at least part of the problem stems from the fact that he’s so prolific. When you write and shoot an average of a movie a year, not all of them are going to be classics.
I’m grateful for the output. I’m not saying he should’ve slowed down necessarily. But by the law of averages…
You can’t call VCB a return to form. You wouldn’t even be aware that it was a WOODY ALLEN movie unless someone told you. His old auteurish style has complelely disappeared.
As much as I love a lot of those pictures, this is really an exciting, unexpected development.
I’m very interested in how you’ll react to VCB, Nicky….
August 18, 2008 at 11:11 pm
I de-spammed both your comments….hopefully that won’t happen again.
You’ll have to tell me which one you want me to keep, though.
Ok, I’m off to read your comment and then I’m coming back here to read your review.
Back in a flash!
August 18, 2008 at 11:17 pm
OH THANK GOD, Evan. That was driving me CRAZY.
You know…
It’s your site so you pick whichever one you like best. I did them both straight up off the top of my head and they’re pretty similar. So it’s your call.
I didn’t make any points that were that definitive in the second one.
So it doesn’t really matter. I guess the first one’s fine. But if you REALLY like the second one, it’s totally up to you…
August 18, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Lovely piece, Miranda.
You’re right, we approach films like this in different ways. Your review projects a much more emotive state of mind, while mine is a bit more analytical. (Although I think I conveyed the sensuousness of the film’s production design.) That is certainly to be expected, as many of the films that light a fire under me are more boyish in nature.
(See what I wrote on Speed Racer…I pretty much sounded like you did in your BRIDESHEAD review).
A couple of additional thoughts…
As I’ve read reviews around the net, I find that the critics who mentioned the matter of fact voiceover hated it, while everyone else didn’t mention it at all. I’m assuming it didn’t really bother you, either? I thought it was kind of charming, but in the end I didn’t feel like it really added much. So I just didn’t talk about it.
Secondly, I just read an interview with Woody in Newsweek that was fascinating and gave me new insight into this film. The man is a relentless pessimist and he said he makes films primarily to distract himself from the meaningless of it all. You can see that most clearly (SPOILER!!!!) in the ending, when no one is really together and no one is happy at all.
They’ve had these wonderful little trysts, but in the end they have to return to the empty void of nothingness.
When the interviewer told him that many people have viewed his films as therapy – they watch them to get invigorated by life and love again – Allen said something along the lines of, “Well, that’s nice. But it doesn’t really mean anything, because once they leave the theatre they still have to go out into a cold, cruel world that hates them.”
Is it possible for us to disassociate a filmmaker from his films when we’re aware of what he was intentionally trying to say in the first place?
August 19, 2008 at 10:35 am
That’s very true, Evan. That’s where it all starts, unfortunately.
I lucked out. I ended up with the best parents in the entire world. Makes the loss of my mom much more difficult.
But her suffering is over. She’s out of this place. Due to my beliefs, I know I’ll be with her again one day. The only positive (and you won’t get many out of something like that) is that it made my close family even closer.
But you don’t get to choose these circumstances or when they will happen.
Rough year for me in 2005. But I didn’t even flinch.
I’m sure that anyone that looks at me would never believe that a glorious green eyed sexpot like moi could be so tough. You have to be in this life. You never know which way those balls are going to roll.
But no big deal. Everything else is small potatoes after a year like that.
I’m headed off to California as soon as I can finesse some things. It may take longer than I would like. But I’m persistent. There will be a number of people that will be happy about that. One in particular.
There are far too many people that adore me. Sincerely…
August 21, 2008 at 12:33 am
Wait…
I thought you already lived in California.
Where are you now?
August 21, 2008 at 9:31 am
Mmmmm…
I thought that I had covered this several times over – albeit obliquely.
I’ve had a cyberstalker and loved ones and myself have had difficulties with crazy unbalanced mentally retarded scumbags all over the internet, which is WHY there are no pictures of me connected to the site and also why I am deliberately vague about what area I reside in.
No, I’m not living in California, Evan. I wish I were. EVERY DAY.
(Where am I? On the west coast. But a LONG WAY from California. Somewhere in the Pacific Northwest.)
Then I would’ve been pursuing acting 24/7 for a number of years now instead of starting this site. The blog is not a hobby or fun. It’s a means to an end.
Plus if I were living in Cali then I’d be down there um…enjoying myself with someone special instead of doing the long distance dance. Neither of us wants it. But until things get settled it will be like that.
Thank God it’s only temporary…
August 21, 2008 at 10:39 am
m., i like ‘blueberry’ but not this vcb thing….
and i have no problem with unhappy endings (hell i’m sure i like ‘priceless’ despite the happy. because i adored all that occurred before so much…) )
hmm i don’t where to go with this but i think pretty much everything i’ve liked this year has ad an air of unreality to to it ala priceless/in bruges/jellyfish/my blueberry nights/paranoid park
hmm not sure what this means/or where i should go with it. i don’t know…
vcb like so much all are raving about seems better on paper or is something i respect more than i admire. but i’m pretty sick of these i’d like to like things too. ha ha…..
hmm i also liked ‘elegy’ more than vcb. but the elegy has a lower score on metecritic so it’s got to be better right ??? geek rule number #17. sorry…
despite ‘elegy’ supposedly getting blasted for being slow paced/downbeat whatever. i loved it a lot more…and yep it more funny as in got to laugh at scenes a bit. just figured i mention that since the cruz factor is in both…
and hell no to cruz being a lock for a nom for vcb. don’t let her cash in her ‘good will’ points yet. she didn’t earn it enough for vcb.
i don’t know i mostly felt vcb was uh ok.
and even if ‘elegy’ isn’t gonna stick with me awesomely guess i felt better about it in the theatre and after it too.
hmm i really liked the scene in vcb when vicky changed clothes 3000 times. and you know i was rooting for ‘it’ to happen between vicky/juan one more time but i loved the surprise we got….
August 21, 2008 at 11:16 am
Ahhh, you’re such a little cynic, glimster. But I suppose that’s precisely why I think you’re swell.
Well, like you I ADORED MBN, PRICELESS and IN BRUGES. Didn’t see the other two. We’re getting JELLYFISH but I think I’ll pass.
I’m still wickedly pissed that we’re (likely) not getting THE FALL and that really is the kind of film that should be seen in a theatre. It has something to do with the distribution rights. I talked to a lovely gentleman who knows what’s what in my area. He looked at the trailer and he was definitely intrigued. Hadn’t even heard about it until I told him. But he can’t show it unless those things can be straightened out. His hands are tied.
GOD….
But you’re not a big WOODY ALLEN fan anyway, are you, glim?
I’m not going to see ELEGY. I don’t care for Ms. Cruz particularly. I don’t think she’s attractive or sexy at all. So a film that hinges around her supposed beauty doesn’t exactly work for me. Same as Ms. Paltrow or Ms. Blanchett would be in a role like that.
But (as I am a fair minded individual) I DO think she was very sexy in VCB and I feel that she does deserve an Oscar nomination for it. She’s on my long list now. I liked her a lot in VOLVER (she was award worthy in that as well) but normally she doesn’t float my boat. AT ALL.
I’m not sure about the VICKY/JUAN ANTONIO thing. The opposites attract thing can be a powerful force at the beginning – that whole moth to a flame type deal. But I don’t think it really works long term. (Though I’m sure there are notable exceptions to that. I’m talking GENERALLY.)
So I don’t think they were especially suited to each other. Sure she was in love with him. But I don’t know if it would’ve helped to be eased out of that marriage for a short term relationship that was never going to last anyway.
VICKY’S marriage to DOUG is doomed regardless. She all ready had that guy pursue her at school. There will be other men and she may leave DOUG without having an affair anyway.
For JUAN ANTONIO, there will always be MARIA ELENA. Even if he marries someone else.
It’s the old AVA GARDNER/FRANK SINATRA dynamic. Lovers forever. Regardless. But they can’t live together OR live without each other.
Anyone who gets in the middle of that (foolish women, believe me… ) is gonna get some pretty hard knocks.
Such is life, glimster. Have to take the good with the bad.
There is no getting around it….
August 21, 2008 at 12:58 pm
m. your film novice aka me….this was my first woody allen thing….
the main reason i caught ‘elegy’ was because of the free screening factor. figured guess i may has well. don’t know if i was gonna if not for that. doubt it…this getting bad/mediocre reveiws. but i should come to see that has my friend…
it’s cool you don’t want to see ‘elegy’ i say liking this film has little to do being wowed by cruz in that way or even kingsley.
the star of this film is the words and the co stars are cellphones and showing glasses of wine
well there a film this year having a bigger use of cellphones and showing wine. i doubt it.
re:vicky yeah i doubt she was gonna leave that other guy. i was just hoping there would be more more time with juan. see i really am a romantic…
but if vicky/juan were to try and it likely went short term, i wonder would being around juan get her to change her views a bit or get her looking for different types of guys ??? or would it be just a juan thing ????
or acting/thinking differently than usual being ok/as long as she wasn’t on her home turf ???
August 21, 2008 at 1:16 pm
OH MY GOD, glim.
VCB was your very first WOODY? WOW.
Congratulations, young man. You passed the course.
Well, VCB is quite the film to ease into WOODY’S filmography and advance your education. You lucked out, babe. It’s easily WOODY’S best movie in 10 years. More like 15 really. Not since HUSBANDS & WIVES IMO.
As far as ELEGY is concerned, BEN KINGSLEY is a GREAT actor. But with PENELOPE in it, I’ll take a pass. She just doesn’t do it for me.
Tough to say about VICKY and JUAN ANTONIO. They say that people ARE very different when they’re away on vacation. They (supposedly) have flings, do drugs, drink too much. Just overindulge and get wild because they’re away from home and they can do stuff anonymously.
I’ve never known anyone personally that did that kind of thing. I wouldn’t either. But that’s what I’ve heard.
Yeah, it’s possible that VICKY (even if she had a short term thing with JUAN ANTONIO) MAY have become interested in different kinds of guys and been slightly less uptight from that point on.
Both she and CRISTINA were in their twenties (I imagine) so there is some leeway there. But by 30 I think that our character traits and our personalities are pretty much locked in from that point on. By the time you’re 30, IF YOU’RE NOT a free spirited gadabout that picks flowers by the side of the road, YOU AIN’T EVER GONNA BE.
THAT’S IT…
I’m not 30. But I will be eventually. Plus you become an astute observer of human behaviour if you’re an actor.
That’s my personal observation for the day, glim. You little romantic, you….
August 22, 2008 at 12:32 am
Thanks for the clarification, Miranda. I was hoping it was somewhere in the midwest so you could meet my babies. Oh well.
Good luck on the move down to Cali. Personally I would want to live in San Diego. Oh my, what a nice, temperate climate.
August 22, 2008 at 12:51 am
Yeah…
California’s gorgeous, Evan. I’m looking forward to living down there.
And of course someone else will be very grateful.
So I’m happy about that. It’s always nice to be appreciated by the right person…
August 22, 2008 at 1:46 am
m. ah it sad you won’t get a chance to see the fall on the big screen.
you’ve been hoping for months and there’s the guy pearce factor…
speaking of guy he’s in a new film that i hope hits your area…
Question: Guy Pearce has done the protagonist film but he’s obviously an actor that brings more to the table than meets the eye. Was he a very early choice? Why the decision to cast an Australian actor to play that role?
Nachmanoff: I was fortunate enough to be able to really get the people I wanted in all the roles in this movie. I’d always been a fan of Guy Pearce’s, from Priscilla, Memento, LA Confidential, The Proposition. In fact, I think I’ve seen almost all of his movies – well, probably not, because he’s made a lot of movies but I’ve seen a lot of his work and I always find him to be compelling, refreshing. And he’s really one of those actors who is extremely hard to pin down. He doesn’t even look the same from movie to movie, you know? But the closest thing in my mind to this movie was the part he played in LA Confidential. Where he really plays – in Traitor, Guy Pearce plays a thinking man’s detective and that was really, really important for this role. There aren’t that many actors that you can cast, A, who will hold the screen opposite Don Cheadle on that part of the story, and B, really play like they have the intelligence that was required for the character because I didn’t want this to feel like just another cop and bad guy movie. It’s complicated on Don’s side, Samir’s side, but it’s also complicated on the side that Guy Pearce plays as a counter-terrorist agent. Because trying to stop the bad guys, if you will, is not a simple thing any more. The world has become very complicated. And the conflict’s complicated. And in many ways, I think the notion of “our team” and “their team” was blown apart when the Cold War ended. One of the reasons that I think it’s been such a difficult thing for Americans to grapple with, and maybe why it’s been difficult for some of these films to yet take hold, is that people are wrestling with how we see ourselves, how we see the enemy. And it’s been hard for people to understand where the other side is coming from.
anyway the film’s ‘traitor’ and also has don cheadle…..
here’s the link that i swiped the guy tidbit from/ maybe it will have another tidbit you’ll like but if not. that’s ok…
http://www.moviehole.net/200814965-exclusive-interviewjeffreynachmanoff-2
August 22, 2008 at 3:44 am
Well, it’s not for sure, glim. THE FALL could come here. Anything is possible. But as each week passes it gets more and more unlikely.
We’ll see. I don’t think it will be out on DVD here in early September. We may actually have a slightly larger window of time. So who knows…?
But whatever happens will happen inevitably. C’est la vie.
Thank you for that, glim. I love GUY PEARCE. Still think he should be an Oscar nominee by now (for either LA CONFIDENTIAL or MEMENTO). He’s fantastic.
Interesting. STEVE MARTIN was actually involved in this project.
Thanks, glim. You’re such a sweetie bringing that to me. Means a lot.
You’re absolutely true blue, honey. What would I do if I didn’t have you here?
August 24, 2008 at 6:27 am
I’m still dying to see this…haha, and The Fall
*sigh*
August 24, 2008 at 6:51 am
Yeah, THE FALL is a pretty tricky proposition in my particular neck of the woods, Nick.
Has to do with distribution. Have NO IDEA AT ALL what’s up with that. If it played the Toronto fest, then it should have the proper things in place, RIGHT?
THE FALL comes out on DVD at the beginning of September. But we sometimes get the indie/artsy stuff some time later. Those types of films often have a small delay for DVD release purposes.
This was all discussed with a wonderful gentleman who knows what’s what in my area.
That’s all I know.
Seems like an enormous bloody shame. THE FALL is the kind of film that genuinely needs a theatrical experience to be appreciated properly. It possesses that kind of scope.
Sometimes life is just a bitter pill that you have to swallow regardless of your desires. Best thing you can do is wash it down with your favourite drink. Seeing as there’s no getting around it.
Where’s my chocolate milk…?
As for VCB, I will be seeing that every bloody month until I get tired of it. Makes me ecstatic that WOODY is still at the very top of his game regardless of all these years that have passed by.
Not to worry, Nicky. I’m sure you’ll see them both soon.
SO GLAD YOU’RE BACK, MY SWEET BABOO.
ABSOLUTELY. COMPLETELY. UTTERLY.
August 25, 2008 at 4:13 am
Because I know you love the Woodman, I was really hoping you of all people would love this one Miranda and I’m glad to see you did.
I’ve read the criticisms of it and I’m just not buying any of them. It’s like I saw a completely different movie. I totally left my cynicism at home and fell for this movie, hook, line and sinker.
August 25, 2008 at 11:29 am
Hey, my precious Craig…
Well, I don’t think I’ve EVER come across a badly acted WOODY ALLEN movie. Even in his very worst effort (IMO) MIGHTY APHRODITE, MIRA SORVINO gave an awesome comedic performance and won a deserved Oscar for it.
So I don’t think I’ve ever had a complaint in that area.
VCB’S cast is just plain lovely to look at. JAVIER may not be the male model definition of classically handsome, but who cares? He’s gorgeous just the same…and that charisma. I was unfamiliar with REBECCA HALL up until this point but she’s rather easy on the eyes. SCARLETT goes almost without saying: smoky voice, curves, all that blonde hair with those soulful deep green eyes. No wonder she’s the current sex goddess.
Pretty difficult not to fall irresistably in love with a movie like that…and Barcelona – the actual place – is an absolute treasure. I had seen the architecture before. I knew it was an exquisite beauty of a city.
So you have this luscious cast in this charming locale in the midst of summer in this brilliantly written and directed film about life and love?
How could you possibly miss?
I do believe over at your site (LIVING IN CINEMA) that you said that VCB was “intoxicating” – and if I’m not mistaken you referred to MY BLUEBERRY NIGHTS in precisely the same way. I agree totally and, like you, they hit me at the same level and I gave them both four stars.
So, all I can say is: this is an expected pleasure, Mr. Kennedy and I’m sure we’ll be on the same page over and over again.
Count on it……….
September 11, 2008 at 2:34 am
This is the first review I’ve read of VCB. PERIOD. Yeah, I’m behind.
I wish I had more to say, but as you rightly pointed out a couple of weeks ago, the MBN crowd should really connect with this. I’m not nearly as well viewed in Woody’s films as you and others, but I think I’m approaching double digits. If he continues like this I’ll be thrilled. For some reason I skipped Scoop after I enjoyed Match Point, and, in a really weird way, VCB almost made me like Cassandra’s Dream more in hindsight.
Anyway, a wonderful review as always. Beyond the wonderful acting, music, and scenery, I appreciated how realistic it was, as you pointed out. Look forward to finding this one again in the future someday.
(By the way, random note. I saw Duffy perform on Letterman last week – I like her style.)
September 11, 2008 at 3:06 am
Wow…and I’m the very first, Danny? I’m delightfully honoured. Thank you kindly for the compliment as well. I always treasure them coming from you.
But it is understandable that you’d be behind. You’ve had a trillion things to do OFF line as of late.
Yeah, I am ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE BEYOND A SHADOW OF A DOUBT that anyone that adored MY BLUEBERRY NIGHTS is going to (at least) like VCB one hell of a lot. One has a rather realistic (and sad) conclusion and the other is far more hopeful. One is more comedic and the other is a straight up drama. But they’re both ultimately passionate, romantic films that rely greatly on mood and atmosphere.
Well, for my money be glad you bypassed SCOOP. I thought it was bloody awful and that ending is so stupid. Really abrupt, feels like it’s tacked on and it takes you a few hours to realize that that is what actually happened.
I didn’t see CASSANDRA’S DREAM as it never played in my home town. I’m largely allergic to renting DVDs (been there, done that – more than enough) but I’ll likely catch it when it makes it to the tube.
Yeah, VCB takes the cake – and then some. Looking forward to my third viewing which should happen shortly. I’m counting down the hours.
Oh…For those of you that don’t know (or haven’t been informed), I’m seeing DUFFY live next month. I have tickets for her show here. Should be a blast and a half.
But I do feel bad that I get to see her before you do, Danny. Well, I’m sure she’ll be back to your neck of the woods soon. You do a fair amount of travelling so you probably won’t have to wait till she returns to Minnesota.
That’ll be cool…..
September 12, 2008 at 4:41 am
The very first, I promise. Still need to make my way elsewhere to read the others, though.
I think you might find part of Cassandra’s Dream intriguing, even if only in the acting and not the writing. Next to In Bruges it’s pretty much the only performance of Colin Farrell’s that I’ve enjoyed. Either way, it definitely has that Woody feel to it, which counts for at least something.
I wonder how the energy will be at the Duffy show. She doesn’t seem like a very energetic performer, but maybe she’ll do some covers or something. With a friend, I think you’ll have fun indeed.
September 12, 2008 at 12:05 pm
m. collin farrell has a sex tape ! *yay*
ok true to most celeb sex tape sex stuff/ the tape isn’t very ‘good’ but it’s celeb so i’ll watch. hell now you don’t really have to be a celeb to have a sex tape out ala whomever that was on american idol or the european big brother. so…the collin tape….
and hey if you’ve seen vicky cb again let me know your take on jb’s character clothing thing.
p.s. the best short celeb sex tape has to be the severina vuckovic thing. they don’t make them like that anymore…
and now you can really shake your head…
September 12, 2008 at 12:08 pm
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/9203/memylionae8.jpg
September 12, 2008 at 6:34 am
Thanks, Danny. You are SO very awesome, my darling.
As for CR…
Aside from IN BRUGES, I’ve only seen COLIN FARRELL in two other things: ASK THE DUST and a cameo in VERONICA GUERIN. By the time I got around to viewing some of his work, his reputation had all ready preceded him.
Not really sure I understand this. Well, maybe. I have my own theories but I won’t go into them here. Every time I see COLIN FARRELL interviewed he seems so sweet, vulnerable and decent. But people keep talking about him like he was the whore of Babylon.
Never forgot that interview where EILEEN ATKINS discussed how he did everything imaginable to get her into bed…and she’s nearly 70. She was very flattered but she couldn’t take him seriously. Did that really happen or is it urban legend territory? Plus I’d also come across interviews where he talked about dallying with prostitutes.
Fairly odd, I’d say. He seems like a lovely guy and he’s obviously very talented. *shakes blonde mane* Oh, who the hell knows?
But he’s great fun to watch. I didn’t realize until later that HAYLEY ATWELL is also in CR – and I loved her so much in BRIDESHEAD REVISITED. So it does give me hope that it may be interesting to a degree.
Yeah, the impression that WOODY is capable of giving as an auteur is something that I definitely respond to. You have no trouble identifying anything as a WOODY ALLEN film until he did Match Point. Though I didn’t care for that particular movie, I’m just ecstatic that he’s mixing it up, doing fresh, interesting things and continuing to put it out there.
WOODY’S my hero.
Yeah, I could be shooting myself in the foot seeing DUFFY this early in her career. I usually sit back and let individuals develop as people and musicians. Then they have lots to bring to the table and they’re far more interesting to see live. Plus if you see them too early they don’t have much material of their own!
But I am looking forward to it.
Yeah, Jacki and I are going to paint the town red that night. She was over at CP a few days ago. I was waiting for her to call me back and she posted just to let me know that she was around and swamped with stuff.
I told her that apparently this is what people do now. When they don’t have time to call or email, quite often they leave messages or posts at the site. Lets people know they’re thinking about you and that they’re actually alive.
I’m still learning about all this net etiquette. Even though I have yet to turn 30.
You crazy kids today….
September 13, 2008 at 12:04 am
glim, I saw VCB again last night for the third time. I LOVED JAVIER’S wardrobe. That red shirt looked so beautiful on him. I don’t know about those sneakers, though. They seemed kind of goofy to me. More American than strictly European as well.
Other than those shoes, his character dressed very well. Casually elegant, I thought.
Why? You’re not getting a makeover, are you, glim?
I heard that COLIN had a sex tape LONG AGO. There were a ton of rude remarks that I heard about it which I shall not repeat here.
I’m not going to say anything to embarrass the poor man. (NOT that he would ever be reading this in any case…) Especially when I’ve never seen it.
These people that make sex tapes are morons. Hardy har har. And people tell me that I’m a narcissistic egomaniac? (Well, a couple of my exes did when they were pissed at me. That was pretty close to my final exits, if I recall correctly. I think they were just mad because they knew I was going to leave them flat. On their asses.)
There is NO BLOODY WAY on God’s green earth that I would ever make a tape like that. It’s got nothing to do with morals because it doesn’t mean that you’re a bad person or ridiculously promiscuous if you do that.
IT JUST MEANS THAT YOU’RE AN IDIOT.
I can’t believe that anyone would think that highly of themselves that they would knowingly make something like that. You have to understand that if it gets into the wrong hands LOTS and LOTS AND LOTS of other people will be watching it…and YOU. What in the bloody hell is the appeal of that???
I don’t have an inhibition in the world. THEY ARE ALL LONG GONE. (Oh yeah…) I’m extremely happy with the way I look, thank you very much. I could say a lot of other things but I’ll just shut my piehole for now.
Suffice to say that I would never ever do something even remotely resembling that. I’m tremendously private. The only person I want looking at me is the person I came with.
So to speak.
Severina Vuckovic? Never heard of her. But when I Wickied her, I found out that she was a devout Catholic that preached abstinence in all these countries that she went to as a singer. So then she gets caught banging a married man? She’s quite the four star hypocrite, wouldn’t you say?
What a dumb broad.
Naw, no sex tapes for me, glimster. If anyone wants me for anything exciting, they’ll have to take me to dinner and do a lot of serious begging.
Chocolates and jewelry don’t hurt either. Tell me how wonderful I am. Count the ways, baby. Let me know how bad you want it…and all the riches of the world will be yours.
IF you can handle it. And if is the operative word…
September 13, 2008 at 12:17 am
That’s adorable, glim. Thank you for that, honey. You’re the peachiest.
The beauteous lion is hiding his eyes.
Maybe he made a sex tape that he regrets…?
You just never know.
NEVER…….
December 1, 2008 at 5:32 pm
Now, I LOVED THIS ONE. For reals. Stunning movie. I too adore Woody Allen, and he can still hit most of the right notes after all these years. A true legend.
December 1, 2008 at 7:27 pm
Honey boy, everything that you said is TRUE.
Loved VICKY CRISTINA BARCELONA. I’ve seen it five times now. Absolutely one of the best films of the year.
Not a question in my mind…
WOODY is a complete genius. To have this kind of insight into relationships (and young womens’ attitudes and preferences) when you’re well into your 70s is awe inspiring.
We do agree, Nicky. See…?
The majority of the time, babe. The rest doesn’t matter…