AUSTRALIA **
BAZ LUHRMANN has enormous stones.
To my dying day, I will always love him for making STRICTLY BALLROOM.
After the iconic status deservedly bestowed on 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and its genius director, STANLEY KUBRICK, anyone who has the magnificent zest to open a film with THE BLUE DANUBE blasting gets my vote for gutsy and ambitious.
Yes, even if it’s retro…
But Baz seems to have travelled far from that time and place. He’s completely immersed in the blisteringly theatrical worlds he creates. There is no mute button. He turns everything up to 11…and it stays there perpetually.
A grand motion picture is skillfully constructed. Scale and tone are a big part of that. But Baz is utterly unaware of subtlety or half measures.
It’s not an epic. IT’S AN EPIC.
I don’t see a lot of documentaries. I like fictionalized scenarios. But when the melodrama is THAT BIG, you aren’t rapturously swept away.
You’re dragged there, kicking and screaming….
AUSTRALIA opens in the late 1930s. Uptight Brit LADY SARAH ASHLEY (NICOLE KIDMAN) strongly suspects that her husband is having an affair. She fears that is the reason why he hasn’t returned home after months on end. She is determined to travel Down Under and confront him.
When she arrives in Oz, she discovers she was wrong. Her spouse had acquired FARAWAY DOWNS, a ranch that he was pouring all of his time and energy into. He has also recently been murdered.
Now that the property is her responsibility, Lady Sarah becomes aware that the ranch is close to bankrupt. The evil local landowner, LESLEY “KING” CARNEY (BRYAN BROWN) and his equally brutish compatriot NEIL FLETCHER (the charismatic DAVID WENHAM) want the place to add to their collection. Fletcher is about to marry Carney’s daughter. All of their scheming is mutually beneficial.
Sarah resolves to fight back. She bonds with NULLAH (BRANDON WALTERS), a little native boy whose family lives at FARAWAY DOWNS. She also seeks help from DROVER (HUGH JACKMAN), an independent minded freelance ranch hand who is not only gifted with animals but possesses endless information about running farms easily and to their best capacity.
She knows that she must have the cattle driven to another area if they are to save the property. Drover is dubious. But they reluctantly join forces along with Nullah and a number of other employees.
That’s only the beginning…
The film is a visual feast. Everything looks gorgeous – from the lead actors to the cinematography to the costumes (designed by Baz’s wife CATHERINE MARTIN) to the incredible ebony steed CAPRICORNIA. The score is also lush and lovely.
That is something. But it’s hardly enough…
Baz can easily create an enticing landscape. But he can’t write to save his own life.
Nicole is a brilliant actor. This has been proven over and over again in motion pictures like DOGVILLE, THE HOURS, TO DIE FOR, THE PORTRAIT OF A LADY and FLIRTING. She has done exemplary work that people will be writing and talking about a hundred years from now.
This is the most uneffective performance I have ever seen her give…in anything. She is shrill to the point of being over the top. Sarah is initially too conservative and rather arrogant in the way that a beautiful rich woman could conceivably be. But it goes too far and comes off as caricature.
I’ve never seen Nicole do any acting of this type before. So I assume that Baz let her take it to the wall.
Hugh fares better. He makes the most of a ridiculously underwritten role and engages your sympathies throughout. He’s packed a good forty pounds of muscle onto his lanky frame as well.
But there is not a single solitary bit of chemistry between Hugh and Nicole. None at all…
Though his voice over narration is extremely annoying (something that is clearly not his fault), BRANDON WALTERS shines throughout. His acting is seamless and very natural. Every frame of his expressive little face is a joy to watch.
It was fabulous to see BRYAN BROWN in a movie again. He makes a great villain, especially in conjunction with DAVID WENHAM – who almost singlehandedly steals the picture right out from under the leads.
It may be a personal preference. But I like my romances somewhat grounded in reality. This picture resembles an odd mixture of THE WIZARD OF OZ, RED RIVER, MARY POPPINS, OUT OF AFRICA and an earthshakingly bad episode of DALLAS.
I adore style in terms of film. Substance is wonderful. Most great movies have elements of both. But this is not a triumph of style over substance.
There is no substance whatsoever.
AUSTRALIA is like the most exquisitely carved jewelry box. When you open it, the deep toned velvet is plush and luxurious. But there’s absolutely nothing inside.
It’s as empty as a closet on moving day….

December 1, 2008 at 8:52 pm
Pity, I mean, I was really looking forward to this. Still am of course, but no one seems to be entirely bowled over by it. Hope to see it soon nonetheless. Sorry it didn’t work for you. Nice review too.
December 1, 2008 at 10:03 pm
But these all go to 11…
This review sums up my problem with all of Baz’s films, to be honest. I’ve never been able to sit all the way through Moulin Rouge! or Romeo + Juliet or even Strictly Ballroom. I have tried many, many times, and I just can’t do it.
Baz’s films, they’re all style over substance, and he doesn’t seem to know how to direct actors. The characters in his films, they’re characters rather than actual people, and aren’t fleshed out enough for me to care at all about them. His camera work, too, gives me a headache.
His films are beautiful, but that’s it for me.
December 1, 2008 at 11:14 pm
Thanks, Nicky…
Don’t be disheartened, honey. You MAY love it.
I think J.D. did, didn’t he…? (I just knew that he would…)
But yeah…
It did absolutely nothing for me. Kind of disappointing because this was the ONLY big holiday film I was really gearing myself up for.
But I’m sure I’ll find something interesting that will EXCEED my expectations. So it all evens out in the end.
December 1, 2008 at 11:35 pm
k, that’s hilarious…
“But these all go to 11…”
That just makes me laugh hysterically…
I think I see your point, k. COMPLETELY.
I own SB and I am rather fond of R&J. In spite of the fact that CLAIRE DANES bugs the living hell out of me.
MOULIN ROUGE really made me nuts the first time I saw it.
I went to see that opening night with a guy that I didn’t know that well. I was SO LOOKING FORWARD TO IT, I can not tell you.
Well, I just loathed it with every fibre of my being. I get headaches when I don’t like a movie. I had quite the harsh one when we stepped out of there.
I guess it must have been the look on my face. But he had to turn away from me so that I couldn’t see him laughing. That pissed me off even more. I was ready to smack him.
Finally, he composed himself and inquired, “Did you like it?”
I rolled my emerald green eyes and pronounced every syllable succinctly: “I think I need a f’ing drink.” Of course I wasn’t completely serious. But he burst out laughing.
We were close for a long time. He always used to say that he had never seen anyone have such a negative reaction to MR. Well, considering that the theatre was half full and people in the audience were actually LAUGHING AT IT…
Yeah, they weren’t laughing with it, let me tell you. Not even after NICOLE’S character died…
I was flabbergasted when the Academy Award nominations were announced in 2002. When they called out MR, I couldn’t believe it. I HAD NO IDEA that enough people had nominated it to get it into the final five. At the time, that was particularly mind blowing to me.
I have since come to a grudging acceptance of MR. (Very similar to my initial reaction to FARGO and how I feel about THAT now.) I don’t know if I would EVER give it three stars. I can actually tolerate it now.
But Baz has just lost me with AUSTRALIA.
It’s possible that it may be for good…
December 2, 2008 at 5:35 am
m. ah would you say he’s at less of an all the way up to 11 mode on this than his other films ????
did you say you waited seven years for this ???
hmm i haven’t seen a baz film. but is australia better than his other stuff in any way ???
December 2, 2008 at 10:45 am
Hee hee.
glim, k just said that Baz turns EVERYTHING up to 11.
I don’t want to get clobbered here (as I do adore that girl) BUT…
I don’t think so.
STRICTLY BALLROOM and ROMEO & JULIET weren’t turned up to 11 IMO. The former I own and the other I think is a rather interesting twist on classic SHAKESPEARE, obviously.
Of the films I’ve seen I think AUSTRALIA is BY FAR the worst. It’s a lukewarm mess. Not even a hot mess. It doesn’t have that distinction.
No. OH HELL NO.
I haven’t waited for AUSTRALIA for seven years. I have far too much going on in my life to ANTICIPATE anything for SEVEN YEARS.
Especially a film…
Most particularly a BAZ LUHRMANN film…
I’m not even a fan of his. I just think he’s an interesting anomaly. But he’s really worn out his welcome with me now. So that’s probably it.
I was only looking forward to this since I first saw the trailer. I think that was last spring.
Big letdown – with a capital L.
December 9, 2008 at 8:03 am
Haha, oh boy, you have some GREAT lines in here. Love it.
And I love it because I agree with so much of it. Alas, I LOVE Romeo + Juliet and I liked Moulin Rouge!, but this immediately falls below both of them. Too much ambition here, I suppose.
December 9, 2008 at 10:45 am
Well, thank you for that, honey.
We’ve always been honest with each other (in public and in private – likely more than you could stand at times, I’d wager…hah hah), so any praise from you is much appreciated.
ALWAYS.
“Too much ambition here, I suppose.”
That’s actually an exceedingly astute observation, Danny. I think sometimes good films could be great – and crappy motion pictures are just shy of being wonderful. It’s often heartbreaking because you can see where the ball was dropped and what it could have been.
But it won’t ever be. You just have to let it go…
It’s all a matter of degrees and how all of the elements fit together. When I see a film that’s perfection or close to it, I always marvel at how easily it could have all gone wrong.
THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS is a (literally) brilliant example of that theory.
Yeah, Baz could have made a classic. But it wasn’t.
So we’ve got to move on….