MOVIES AS A THEATRICAL EXPERIENCE: THE WAY THEY WERE
This article is authored by ELLEN STERLING at THE HUFFINGTON POST
In the May 18 edition of THE NEW YORK OBSERVER, LEE SIEGEL wrote an article titled CIAO TO THE CINEPLEX: I MISS MASS CULTURE!
He noted that “The Federal Communications Commission has just decided to allow The Motion Picture Association Of America to send recently released films directly to your television or computer before they are released on DVD or Bluray” and went on to explain the potential impact this will have on moviegoing.
Since I, personally, prefer seeing a film in a theatre as a member of an audience this is sad news indeed. And, equally sadly, it’s already begun to change.
Remember what it used to be like when you went to the movies?
Did you ever tell your children what it was like when there were no commercials – only coming attractions – in the theatre? Have you ever waxed nostalgic for the days when an film advertised to begin at 8 pm actually did begin at 8 or, perhaps, a few minutes later, after the trailers?
Well, my dear, those days are gone and are probably never going to be seen again.
Now, I’m not talking about the 20 minutes of commercials for various products (lots of soft drinks) and TV shows shown before the advertised movie start time. We’re pretty used to this by now and know that if we get to the theatre early we’ll be subjected to this.
No, what I am talking about is totally different.
First, let me explain that here in Las Vegas, movies open weeks – sometimes months – after they open in New York City or Los Angeles. This is true of many large cities – Miami and Seattle among them. For example, CRAZY HEART was released in New York and LA on December 16 and in Las Vegas on February 5. After a while you get used to that.
Foreign films are often difficult to find in Las Vegas. Fortunately, the two theatres closest to my home, THE REGAL VILLAGE SQUARE and THE CENTURY THEATER in The Suncoast Hotel & Casino (Yes! But that’s another story…) are the only two here that regularly play foreign, independent and small films.
It’s nice to know that even if they arrive months after they play on a coast, they will play here. Eventually.
So, that is the overall filmgoing picture here in Las Vegas. And that is what we expected when we went to THE REGAL VILLAGE SQUARE Friday night to catch CITY ISLAND before it leaves on Thursday.
The showing was advertised as beginning at 6:30. We took our seats about 10 minutes before the show and got what we expected, the last 10 minutes of the series of commercials called Regal First Look.
(Most likely it is so called in an attempt to make the audience stuck watching it believe it’s a special privilege to get a first look.)
You know the drill: the 20 minutes of business, a couple of quick commercials (Fandango/Fathom Events) then the trailers for 10 minutes or so and, finally, the film you came to see. That’s what we know and that’s what we expect.
Right? Wrong.
When we went to buy the tickets we saw that the price had gone up 50¢. That might be understandable in a bad year for movie attendance but, when I reported on ShoWest, the annual convention of film exhibitors this year, I noted they said that, despite “the number of US produced films being down 12 percent, attendance was up 11 percent and the box office worldwide totalled a staggering $300 billion.”
But, if Regal needed to raise its prices, I guess 50¢ isn’t too bad.
So we paid and went in. The usual First Look ended and then we were treated to 26(!) minutes or so of more commercials for TV shows and products no one really needs to know about. There were even two ads for the same TV series on two different stations. Couldn’t both stations be listed in one ad?
This ad marathon ended and there were about five minutes of previews. This included one for PRINCESS KAIULANI. It ended with the words Coming Soon written in large white against a black screen. The only thing is, the film was showing in the theatre already.
In the end, we had to pay 50¢ more to have our time wasted.
(And, by the way, we also paid for the privilege of sitting next to a man who loudly munched popcorn out of a huge trough and, that finished, started equally loudly on candy. But that’s another story…)
We really enjoyed CITY ISLAND and I wrote a very positive review for it. But that wasn’t the point.
On the way out we asked the manager, who turned out to be a thoroughly dyspeptic, nasty woman, about the length and abundance of the ads. She explained as if she was talking to recalcitrant four year olds, that we were wrong.
“It’s always been like this. There are 15 minutes of ads and 15 minutes of coming attractions.”
No, I responded. There are always a couple of minutes of ads after the First Look stuff, then the trailers for a few minutes and, finally, the film.
She was insistent (and very rude).
“It has always been like this. And blame CineMedia, not us. They place the ads,” she said, raising her voice. She then turned her back, walked into the box office from whence she’d come and slammed the door.
It was charming.
In researching the issue, I found a terrific website called CaptiveAudience. Browsing it I found Regal is apparently the worst offender. Some theatres do post actual film start times but they’re very difficult to find.
I learned that a class action lawsuit had been filed in 2003 against LOEW’S CINEPLEX ENTERTAINMENT GROUP for showing ads. It was dismissed. The site quotes RAYMOND W. SYUFY, CEO of CENTURY THEATERS.
“If we start showing commercials and go that route, then we are blurring the line between the 500 cable channels at home and the experience we want people to have when they leave their homes.”
Hooray for Mr. Syufy!
So, with more and more time devoted to advertisements in movie theatres, what can we, the people who don’t want to witness the demise of the movie theatre culture, do about it? Maybe we should sign the on line petitions to end this practice and hope it works.
If it doesn’t, I guess I’ll learn to love watching movies at home.





May 31, 2010 at 1:27 am
He noted that The Federal Communications Commission has just decided to allow The Motion Picture Association Of America to send recently released films directly to your television or computer before they are released on DVD or Bluray
see what happens when i miss a few posts around here…
May 31, 2010 at 3:51 am
You haven’t missed anything, sweetie. You’re sharp as a tack.
Though there has been much discussion regarding jumping the gun on theatrical release dates and allowing the public access to films (through cable or DVD) simultaneously or on some highly accelerated schedule, I’ve never talked about it here.
I only put up Ms. Sterling’s article yesterday. So you’re right on the money, baby…
Ms. Sterling wrote an eloquent exceptionally impassioned article. I profoundly agree with every single point she made.
I don’t like the way this is going.
It’s fabulous that there are DVDs. Owning my favourite films is a kick. (Materialism may not be the highest form of existence. But my possessions are immensely important to me.) The DVD window has been shortened to the point that you can barely experience the movies that you love in the cinema before they’re available to view in your home. I have written about that here. That’s a real mistake and something should be done about it.
But it’s doubtful that a reversal will transpire.
I’ve said this a million times. I will not ever back down from this opinion. Movies were meant to be seen in a theatre. There are some films that can never be fully appreciated even on a wide screen TV. LAWRENCE OF ARABIA is a prime example.
Going to the movies is one of the great pleasures of my life. Has been since I was a little girl. When I started seeing a lot of films regularly as a teenager, it was heaven. Glamour and intellectual stimulation is a very powerful combination.
So I’m dead set against anything that would make theatres obsolete or less popular. I think having recently released movies available for use on your TV or computer is the beginning of a very slippery slope. The edges blur and it all starts to go downhill from there.
Call me old fashioned. But I think that theatrical release dates should be sacred and no one should be screwing around with that. As a film aficionado and as an actor, I think that all of that is disastrous and speaks of a future that I have no interest in.
These new policies that they’re trying to implement may seem reasonably innocent. But there are going to be savage impacts down the line.
I adore my cinemas. They should be open and available.
I get the distinct impression that you favour the FCC’s innovations, glimster. You’re one of my cherished friends.
You always will be. I can’t say that their line of reasoning makes good sense.
But that’s just me…
May 31, 2010 at 4:26 am
I get the distinct impression that you favour the FCC’s innovations, glimster. You’re one of my cherished friends.
actually, i’m pretty neutral. i really don’t even understand things.
i’m definitely less bothered by this than you are. i think fcc allowing this to me right now just means another space for the big blockbuster/top five for the weekend type stuff to be everywhere/dominate everything to be the only thing.
i don’t know how much this would affect me. although the reality ms. m. is that i’ve been horrible this year about being able to actually leave the house and get to the theatre (and no i’m not doing anything important).
it’s horrible. don’t think i’ve been to the uh theatre/cinema thing since uh feb or something. not joking i’ve been pretty out it. keep saying i should get back into the flow of going.
keep passing out before i can get to the door…
but if i could watch them from home i probably wouldn’t watch either. ah ah…
the fcc thing just seems aimed towards the big cinema stuff. or their reasons for allowing it seems like it’s more to get some sort of benefit towards those having whatever part in the big/big cinema stuff…
ads/commercials etc…
i usually avoid those. one thing about being late for everything i miss the ads/promos/trailers whatever. and well i miss the first minutes of the film too. but let’s not get into that again..
actually since i mostly go to only certain theatres it’s pretty sane. only get trailer/promos for films that are set to play circa whenever at those theatres…
know when/if i got to the amc. hell 9 hours of clips or just about every subject matter before the films starts. insane. you pay for a ticket then get 700 hours of clips wanting you to buy pop or whatever.
that’s just nuts…
but yeah you can’t beat going to the theatre. where else would you see the film the girlfriend experience, choose a seat and have like 2/3 seats between me and this guy and his girlfriend/wife/date and he/they look at me with attitude and then change seats because i’m too close to them.
yay…
May 31, 2010 at 5:02 am
OK, I get this now.
It’s not like you really felt strongly about this subject one way or the other, glim. It was just a general type of observational comment.
That’s cool. I’m also on your side. Everything that you stated sounds right to me. I think you’re totally correct on every conceivable level.
I have been going to the cinema regularly as of late. I’ve seen eight 2010 releases and I’ve reviewed three of them. (CHLOE was a left over from my home town film festival last fall. But it hit screens in the U.S. this year.)
Some of the flicks that I didn’t critique have been godawful. But I just don’t feel compelled to write about every single thing that I see. There are a lot of reasons for that. None of which I will go into here.
When I first started CP, I thought that I would review every single movie I saw for at least a number of years. (Depending, of course, for how long I actually have this site.) But there’s really no need for that.
Some films are essential to the process. They’re too big, too bold or possess too much prestige. Or they’re arty in a good way. Not too many people will have seen them and it’s always awesome to make your readership aware of them.
It’s great fun to praise the newest blockbuster if it’s surprisingly intriguing or subversive or bring it down to the ground if it’s the usual status quo nonsense.
But not everything has to be written about. There’s too much useless junk in the marketplace and I all ready have 100 reviews (give or take) in my archives. Substantial stuff should be dissected leisurely. But that doesn’t come down the pike every day.
And of course there are many other perfectly legitimate reasons why some movies don’t need to be discussed around these parts. But that’s another story…
glim, anyone who would move in the theatre because of where you were sitting (and give you attitude on top of it…) is a moronic jackass of major proportions. I’m sure you would be a supremely fascinating theatrical companion.
Your opinions and your ideas are always ahead of the curve. Anyone that can’t appreciate your stunning uniqueness can go fly a fricking kite in an electrical storm.
Let’s see where that gets them. Idiots.
I think you’re awesome, my lil southern darling…
June 6, 2010 at 4:18 am
glim, anyone who would move in the theatre because of where you were sitting (and give you attitude on top of it…) is a moronic jackass of major proportions. I’m sure you would be a supremely fascinating theatrical companion.
thanks.
this only happened to me this one time. i’ve told you how i prefer to sit last row in the centre or a bit left of centre. so i was seated in my usual location.
not much of a big deal cause i’m seated sort of close to them. trust me. this pair made a huge production out of it wth evil glares/noises and looking beyond annoyed.
i think the girlfriend experience is the only movie someone thinks they could pull this sort of crap at…
i’m a guy by myself.
they were together/or on a date whatever…the female of the pair is to my left with like three seats between us. and they couldn’t stand the thought of a loser looking kid watching a film featuring a porn star with a female a few feet to the left..oh let’s move and they seemed irritated and try to guilt trip him out.
oh yeah…
even better they seemed to be in their 30s.
pray for the children….
June 6, 2010 at 7:49 am
I guess it’s time to bring back one of my greatest hits.
In the comments section of this post, I talk about some of the experiences I’ve had in the cinema…and how some idiots really need to be slapped down.
Right here
glim, people get unrealistically antsy about sex. A lot of people in North America are incredibly repressed and anxious about it.
Makes no sense to me. But there it is.
If the film had been about any other subject, I can almost guarantee that they wouldn’t have behaved that way. I’m sure it had nothing to do with you, sweetie.
Ha ha. Did they make out while they were watching it? I guess they couldn’t stand to have anyone around observing them.
And by that I mean anyone. At all.
It would have been funny if you had gone over there (after the lights went down) and crawled on your hands and knees in their row and pretended to be looking for something. I wouldn’t advise it because they might’ve found an usher to complain to.
But they definitely deserved it and it would’ve been hysterical.
I don’t get it. Horny and uptight is a rather unusual combination. No wonder they were so edgy.
Not to worry, glimby. I still adore you.
Too god damn bad. F them and the spotted ponies they rode in on.
They should’ve stayed home and watched some porn.
Yeah…
June 8, 2010 at 8:58 pm
well, this was the opening night of the girlfriend experience at the angelika.
what was this? the 7 something pm/8 pm screening and uh you know people seating wise seemed to start in the middle of the theatre and then head towards the back.
so it was a little too crowded i guess. head count was 50 something people there. I had a hard time counting because people were coming in during the trailers etc.
(so my guess was like 48 – 55 people.)
so no section with enough privacy for them to work their magic. but i was the only one to get this treatment. so all is safe in the world…
June 8, 2010 at 9:50 pm
I don’t give a rat’s ass, my lil southern sweetheart.
glimby, you are a wonderful guy. I don’t like to see anyone I care about get treated like that. If I had been there, they wouldn’t have walked away free and clear.
Damn straight.
I don’t believe in putting up with other people’s nonsense. Strangers don’t necessarily have to go out of their way for you.
But rudeness, to my mind, is completely unacceptable.
I had a decent upbringing. So I know how to behave. Most of the time I can be eminently charming with absolutely no effort.
But I was never what you would call a tolerant girl. Every year that goes by, I am less impressed with the lack of civility and graciousness that I experience everywhere.
So I’ve never had any problem showing maladjusted idiots where the ground is. They’ll be smudge marks on the road to hell.
I’m very protective of the people I love. I’d go to the wall for them. Then there are a ton of others that I’m friendly with on an ongoing basis – on the net or off.
So that’s the chosen circle.
If anybody wants to start something, I will definitely finish it for them. And if they take after someone I care about, they might as well move to a secluded island and hide.
Because I will find them.
When I do, let’s just say it definitely won’t be all sweetness and light.
Be careful what you wish for. You just might get it…