KIM MORGAN WAXES RHAPSODIC ABOUT MEAN STREETS

ageofinnconce2
Age-of-Innocence_l
age_promote4
Color%20of%20Money%20pic%201
tcr_color02
00283
AgeWater

FROM THE HUFFINGTON POST

I’m a big fan of KIM MORGAN.

She’s a phenomenal writer that also possesses an extensive knowledge of film. Her enormous enthusiasm and great love for cinema can be found in every magnificent word.

Plus she’s yet another glamorous blonde…

It’s gorgeous, mysterious, darkly poetic work that sears right through your soul. Once I’ve read one of her articles I have to start again at the beginning. She packs so much evocative detail into each piece that you don’t want to miss anything.

Ms. Morgan worships MARTIN SCORSESE. As do I. She adores New York. That’s a place that I’ve not only always wanted to visit but likely have overly romanticized due to my obsession with WOODY ALLEN movies.

As she and a variety of others have pointed out over time, Manhattan is a fabulous place to live, work or dream. But the New York that we see in the theatre never really existed.

It’s a wicked shame. But I’m sure that it’s true.

In this excellent post, Ms. Morgan makes a case for MARTIN SCORSESE’S MEAN STREETS.

In my opinion, GOODFELLAS is his masterpiece. Aside from that, my other favourites are THE COLOR OF MONEY, THE DEPARTED, ALICE DOESN’T LIVE HERE ANYMORE and THE AGE OF INNOCENCE.

But I do agree wholeheartedly that MEAN STREETS has never really gotten its due. It’s highly underrated and, as she so eloquently points out, it’s been a huge influence on countless filmmakers and motion pictures since its release in 1973.

I miss New York City.

I miss the New York City I’ve never seen – the one I’ve only seen in movies. And after spending time in the CAPITAL OF THE WORLD a little over a year ago, I thought of all kinds of New York (from MANHATTAN to AFTER HOURS to BROADWAY DANNY ROSE and on and on and on).

But strolling through some beautiful areas and others much too cleaned up (Times Square), my mind wandered to JAMES CAGNEY and JOHN GARFIELD growing up so gorgeously tough and talented in Hell’s Kitchen (which isn’t so hellish anymore) and The Dead End Kids gaining advice from both of those street wise geniuses as they, cinematically speaking, brawled and cracked wise on those corners.

And then my mind returned to a movie that for me, is this city – MEAN STREETS.

And of course much has been written about MARTIN SCORSESE’S master work and most of us love it.

(If you love movies, how can you not?)

But it had been quite some time since I watched the picture, and upon returning, my ardour was reignited. As WOODY ALLEN would say, I don’t just love the movie, I luurve it. And with further reflection, I thought the picture, of late anyway, just doesn’t get its due any more.

Do we take it for granted? We shouldn’t. It’s absolutely perfect.

Let’s just start with the opening – an opening that ranks as one of the greatest title sequences of all time. The screen is black. A faceless narrator exclaims: “You don’t make up for your sins at church. You do it in the streets. You do it at home. The rest is bullshit and you know it.”

A young man wakes up in the middle of the night. The sounds of the city are outside. He walks over to his bedroom mirror, takes a look at himself and then returns to bed. As his head reclines toward his pillow, he is suddenly moving in slow motion. The thumping beat of THE RONETTES’ BE MY BABY begins and the scene shifts to a screening of Super 8 films of the young man and his friends.

Just as RONNIE SPECTOR breaks into the beautifully sweet chorus of Be my/be my baby the film reveals its title in plain, typewritten letters: Mean Streets.

Yes.

This opening always gets me right in the gut and mysteriously both the hard and soft places of my heart. It even, at times, almost makes me cry. No, not almost. It does make me cry. It’s just so raggedly lovely and wonderfully bittersweet and beautiful and tough and tender. It’s reminiscent of a past that isn’t entirely mine and yet, Scorsese makes me feel like it was – almost one hundred percent.

It gets me the way BENJAMIN BRADDOCK depressively swims and fornicates to SIMON & GARFUNKEL’S APRIL COME SHE WILL or SAM ROTHSTEIN falls for GINGER McKENNA to LOVE IS STRANGE.

(I could list more than a dozen Scorsese music moments that touch me in multiple ways.)

Released in 1973, MEAN STREETS, a masterpiece of story, substance, music, camerawork and colour, is one of the most influential movies of the last 30 odd years. Inspired by, among other influences, classic Hollywood cinema, the French New Wave, and of course, Scorsese’s own life growing up and observing life in New York City, MEAN STREETS’ raw, blood soaked power has still, in my mind, found no cinematic equal.

Aesthetically and thematically honest, as well as experimental and purposeful, it’s a work of art that’s never faded through time. It still makes me revved up and emotional and depressed and happy and…yearning. There’s a yearning to MEAN STREETS that not only taps into creating something within your own personal life, but to create something, anything outside of it. As with all of Scorsese, there’s a sensuality to it that’s bloody and lovely and in moments, profoundly moving.

The story is noir bathed in red light.

HARVEY KEITEL plays CHARLIE, an inhabitant of New York’s Little Italy who is raggedly progressing toward manhood. His best friend is JOHNNY BOY (ROBERT DE NIRO), a volatile, immature but ultimately lovable character who gets Charlie in more trouble than he needs. Charlie is trying his best to become something, but he is met with constant dilemmas.

He works for his uncle (Cesare Danova), an old school Mafioso who would like to move him up in the business. But Uncle disapproves of Charlie’s friends, chiefly his epileptic lover, Teresa (Amy Robinson) and Johnny Boy, who is “touched in the head” and an instigator of unnecessary disorder. Uncle advises Charlie to remove them from his life. But this is not so easy.

Nothing is easy for Charlie. Strongly Catholic, he is guilt ridden by his every move. While he sits at the bar in his neighbourhood hangout, questioning his penance, he watches Johnny Boy walk toward him and almost humorously asks: “You talk about penance and this is what walks through the door?”

Johnny Boy certainly walks through the door. His entrance is a tour de force of exciting visual and sonorous stimuli. Bathed in the bloody red light of the bar, shot in slow motion and accompanied by THE ROLLING STONES’ JUMPIN JACK FLASH , the joy and ambiguity of Johnny Boy is summed up in less than 30 seconds.

He is the streets. He is exciting, nervous energy. He is trouble amidst trouble. He’s your future if you don’t watch out. And he’s also one hell of a fighter on a pool table – the way he kicks with such intent. In fact, that Mook fight tuned to PLEASE MR. POSTMAN is one of my favourite fight scenes in a movie. It’s so sloppy and real yet funny and repugnant. This is how fights really happen. They’re a scary mess but sometimes, oddly hilarious.

And Johnny Boy is kind of hilarious. The symbol of uncertainty that, like the streets, threatens the picture’s world with kinetic violence, he’s an attractive force. But like many reckless forces, they burn out. Charlie attempts to ride this out with some semblance of control, but he can’t avoid the tumult that will engulf around his own life.

What is so unequivocally brilliant about this film is that Charlie never has to tell us as much. Because of Scorsese’s expert technique, we know the picture’s nature instinctively. Scorsese displays the randomness of these people’s lives with saturating experimentalism; his inventive style is not a glaring gimmick but a natural expression of street and conscience.

MEAN STREETS contains so many influential techniques it would require pages to list them all, but some do bear mentioning – particularly for how they are abused in present cinema. As most of us know, MEAN STREETS, like other filmmakers of the period utilized the New Wave technique of a moving camera, now seen often in movies and TV commercials.

It used Super 8 film stock to convey happy, jumpy memories, which is now an overused, trite standard á la THE WONDER YEARS and countless other more recent examples. MEAN STREETS employed the character introducing title sequence, where key figures are shown doing something (Johnny Boy blows up a mailbox) – and then their names are typewritten on the screen. This was used in TRAINSPOTTING, a movie that has more than a few references to Scorsese.

It was scored with pop music as an interesting counterpoint to violence. (Clearly, Scorsese’s musicality has been imitated effectively in films like RESERVOIR DOGS.)

MEAN STREETS’ film references contained a specific potency that plays differently than the reference soaked movies of QUENTIN TARANTINO. I love Tarantino’s operatic movie mélange but with films now so readily available on DVD, MEAN STREETS’ snippet from THE SEARCHERS feels rarer, and in a way, more sacred.

I’m not one to downgrade the importance of CITIZEN KANE and its influences (and certainly Scorsese wouldn’t as well) but MEAN STREETS is at this point, just as influential.

TAXI DRIVER, RAGING BULL and GOODFELLAS may make the AFI lists, but MEAN STREETS deserves high mention.

So many films emulate MEAN STREETS, but very few have achieved its beautiful, ugly, vulnerable, violent and thrilling power.

If a movie could serve as my most beloved dysfunctional ex boyfriend, MEAN STREETS would be him.

It’s one of the great loves of my life.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: