COCO BEFORE CHANEL **

lu1228_coco1_5m173cib8t4r0gow8c40ck4w4_6ylu316ao18eg404k0ok48wkw_th
coco_before_chanel_2009_1024x768_459867
cocoavantchanel5
coco-before-chanel-20090820020054266_640w
coco_before_chanel02
coco-before-chanel

GABRIELLE (COCO) CHANEL was an extraordinary woman.

The restless ambition and meticulous genius she possessed resulted in the glittering unforgettable House of Chanel. The gorgeous objects of desire she created nearly one hundred years ago are as fresh and relevant today as they were back then: simple black dresses, decorative but functional suits, quilted handbags, multiple strands of pearls, tasteful slingbacks and iconic fragrances.

She was also responsible for the casual glamour that females currently enjoy in their every day lives. She got women out of corsets and into pants – an idea that was revolutionary at that point.

Coco was a rule breaker and a trailblazer. She was a fascinating and complex personality. Her influence is strongly felt to this day.

So one would hope that COCO BEFORE CHANEL, a motion picture about her early years, would do the grande dame justice.

Not this time…

As a small child in the 1890s, GABRIELLE CHANEL’S father took her to a Catholic orphanage. She was there for seven years.

He promised that he would come back for her. He never returned.

Several years after her departure at 18, GABRIELLE (AUDREY TAUTOU) is making costumes and singing at a local bar. She longs to be a performer. The patrons nickname her COCO after one of the songs in her repertoire.

Coco is a cynic. She doesn’t suffer fools gladly. Her sense of humour is sharp and sardonic. She brushes off flirtations airily with a wave of her hand.

Men don’t impress her. She’s going to be somebody.

Into her life walks millionaire ETIENNE BALSAN (BENOIT POELVOORDE). He’s pleasant enough. But she can not take him seriously.

Etienne is a member of the upper classes. The French aristocracy recognized no moral code except their own. It was the dawn of the twentieth century. They were very rich and didn’t see the need for virtues such as fidelity or loyalty.

Women and men married, cohabitated with people and had as many lovers as they wanted to. They lived for the moment and never considered the consequences.

Coco thinks the matter over carefully. Being with a man like Etienne could create more problems than she needs. But she finally decides to become his mistress.

She moves into his lavish home. Etienne introduces her to the right people. They are unimpressed by Coco’s voice and her dancing skills. It’s clear that she is never going to be a star of the stage.

But there must be something that she can do successfully. She does know how to sew…

Coco decides that she will design hats. Etienne has a reputation to consider. He has always been popular with the ladies. But he seems strangely possessive of Coco.

He tries to control her. She will have none of it. Etienne asks her to marry him. She turns him down.

In spite of his frivolous exterior, Etienne is more sensitive than he seems to be. (It is a characteristic that he has in common with Coco.) He is also far more insightful than he initially appears.

Coco is fond of Etienne. But she knows that he is not the man for her.

And then came Boy…

ARTHUR “BOY” CAPEL (ALESSANDRO NIVOLA) is an acquaintance of Etienne’s that runs in the same circles. He’s a self made Englishman of considerable wealth and charm.

They first meet at Etienne’s mansion. Coco is dressed in men’s pajamas, her long dark hair flowing down her back.

As she passes by, he softly says two words to her: “You’re elegant.”

Coco is immediately smitten.

Boy is destined to be the love of Coco’s life. He takes her to Deauville for the weekend. Boy lends her the money to open her first store and assists her financially so that she can put together her debut collection of designs.

Coco’s clothes are wildly sought after. She is able to pay him back in no time. She and Boy have a long standing love affair. But they knew there could never be a marriage.

It was not the way it was meant to be.

In one scene, Coco looks him squarely in the eye and says, “I always knew that I would never be any man’s wife.”

You almost believe her.

COCO BEFORE CHANEL should be an interesting interpretation of the legendary designer’s early years. Instead it is utterly lifeless, flat and boring.

It is hard to believe that the talented ANNE FONTAINE directed this anemic biography. She did such a breathtaking job with THE GIRL FROM MONACO.

The cinematography is lacklustre. The art direction is pedestrian. Most of the acting is average at best. You would expect that the costumes would be sumptuous and beyond compare. But they’re nothing special.

The exquisite score by ALEXANDRE DESPLAT (THE UPSIDE OF ANGER, THE GOLDEN COMPASS, CHERI) is one of the few memorable attributes.

Of all the name actors that could have played Coco, AUDREY TAUTOU has the strongest resemblance to Ms. Chanel. Physically, she is perfect casting.

Her performance is fine. But it’s nothing spectacular. She lacks Gabrielle’s blazing fire and stately precision. Her acting is all surface. She’s just not compelling.

The real Coco was.

ALESSANDRO NIVOLA is fabulous. He has little chemistry with Ms. Tautou (they don’t make an entirely convincing fit) but he is marvelously sexy and charismatic.

He’s a native Bostonian who speaks fluent Italian. Alessandro’s French (along with a sensational British accent when he speaks the King’s English) is just as convincing. He’s easily the best thing in the movie.

The other thing is: even if you know nothing whatsoever about Ms. Chanel, if you’ve seen half a dozen motion pictures that represent this particular genre, you will have no problem understanding – right from the beginning – exactly what will happen with this relationship.

The foreshadowing is that clumsy.

It’s heartbreaking. But after all of that rapturous anticipation, COCO BEFORE CHANEL turned out to be a dreadful disappointment.

Oh, well. The horses were nice.

2 Responses to “COCO BEFORE CHANEL **”

  1. Between this and A SERIOUS MAN, looks like we’re going through another stretch where we’re not only not on the same page, we’re reading from different books 🙂

  2. No big deal, Craig. It happens…

    Actually, I am not that surprised. You’re a dyed in the wool Coen Brothers fan. I really don’t get their sensibilities.

    AT ALL.

    Plus I know you have a thing for French girls…and Ms. Tautou is no exception to that rule.

    So the fact that you went for these two flicks with much more passion and enthusiasm than I did is not actually hard for me to grasp.

    You’ve seen the trailer for ASM, right…?

    I’m speaking of the one where they cut all of those sequences together. But the scene that they keep coming back to is the nightmare Larry has where Sy Ableman is hitting his head hard against the blackboard.

    Well, that’s how I felt for the entire running time. I just don’t need to see films like that. Kind of reminded me of CRIMES & MISDEMEANORS.

    Life is harsh. Then you die.

    And your point is…?

    No, I don’t need to wallow in it. I don’t want to waste two hours of my life watching pathetic people that I have no feelings for (though I did have a great deal of sympathy for Larry – none of that was his fault – and it was all pretty horrific) going through a cinematic version of 60s midwestern hell.

    If I had been either entertained by it or thought it was funny, I could have found it tolerable.

    But god damn it…

    Would you look at that parking lot?

    Craig, this is the review that I really wanted to write for ASM. Three letters…

    WTF???

    But then I thought that I would get comments that said that I took the easy way out.

    Whatever. I’ll live. Not going back there again.

    To me, COCO BEFORE CHANEL was very bland in an inoffensive way, while AUDREY came across as much less than advertised.

    But look at the bright side…

    In 2009, we both found PUBLIC ENEMIES quite disappointing. Though you probably enjoyed it more than I did, we also had very similar reactions to (500) DAYS OF SUMMER.

    We both liked THE GIRL FROM MONACO, AN EDUCATION and IN THE LOOP.

    I was enraptured with CHERI. I don’t think you were at quite the same level. But you did like it a lot. I know because we talked about it here.

    Plus we both ADORED INGLOURIOUS BASTERDS and WHATEVER WORKS.

    You see a lot more movies than I do. So I don’t think this is a bad average by any means.

    Never fear, Monsieur Crabcake. Our tastes are very similar.

    That pendulum will swing round again.

    Guaranteed…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: