CARTIER’S 100TH ANNIVERSARY BENEFIT

Posted in Glamour on May 4, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

elizabeth-taylor-16915

Legendary jewelry corporation CARTIER didn’t hold back for their 100TH ANNIVERSARY CELBRATION IN AMERICA at the CARTIER MANSION on 5TH AVENUE to benefit SERVICE NATION, which encourages volunteerism.

DEMI MOORE, EVA MENDES, KATE HUDSON and RACHEL WEISZ may have looked like a million bucks at the CARTIER MANSION last week. But collectively they had on nearly three times that amount in borrowed CARTIER gemstones — and that’s not counting the bling of SIR ELTON JOHN (who also partied there that evening).

KATE’S diamond and onyx panther necklace alone would have set her back $905,000, not to mention her $230,000 diamond cocktail ring and diamond studs.

“I’m very upset that I have to give back this panther ring in the morning,” EVA remarked. But she wasn’t afraid of losing the ring worth $220,000.

“No, they’ve got insurance for that. It’s never happened, because when things are not mine, I take even more care of them.”

Upstairs at the mansion the history of 100 years of conspicuous luxury was told through an extravagant exhibit of bejeweled ornaments created by CARTIER for ELIZABETH TAYLOR, GRACE KELLY, J.P. MORGAN, DORIS DUKE, BARBARA HUTTON, ELTON JOHN’S 43 carat heart shaped sapphire ring and more.

“There was a really lovely, very modern ring for DAISY FELLOWES,” commented DEMI, who helped CARTIER announce their partnership with SERVICE NATION to donate a portion of the sales of their TRINITY bracelet to the organization.

If you can’t afford the jewelry or don’t want to go that route, feel free to pick up a copy of BRUCE WEBER’S anniversary homage to CARTIER, appropriately entitled CARTIER I LOVE YOU, at TENEUES

THE 20 MOST HILARIOUS HOLLYWOOD WOMEN

Posted in Entertainment News, Feminism on May 4, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

Actress Christina Applegate arrives at the "Over Her Dead Body" Los Angeles Premiere at the Arclight Theatre on January 29, 2008 in Hollywood, California.
2008 Producers Guild Awards in Beverly Hills
b-christina-applegate-43e3962f388f1
hunt
c
222huntbonnie
christina_applegate_envisions_2009_main_99471
christina_applegate

Oh, yes…

It’s a very slow news day.

A while back I linked to an EW photo gallery that centred on the 25 funniest women in Hollywood. After that hit the net, they asked their illustrious readership what they thought.

As always, they came up with some inspiring choices.

Here are my favourites: CHRISTINA APPLEGATE, BONNIE HUNT, LILY TOMLIN, KRISTIN CHENOWETH, SARAH CHALKE, DEBRA MESSING, PORTIA DE ROSSI and CAROL BURNETT.

For the whole damn thing, please go here

THE GREAT RACE…

Posted in Hot Video on May 2, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

05

I was completely overjoyed (and very surprised) to find this on YOUTUBE yesterday.

This is one of my favourite sequences from one of my all time favourite motion pictures: 1965’S THE GREAT RACE. It’s the monumental pie fight scene – the biggest ever in film history.

Of course, humour is astoundingly subjective. But I laugh my ass off every time I’ve witnessed this since I was a kid. It is so unbelievably awesome.

I love JACK LEMMON’S snarl (as PROFESSOR FATE) right at the beginning. “You wouldn’t dare.” It’s a line I’ve used often. Usually in combination with phrases that possess much stronger language.

Well, I never said I was a shrinking violet…

So that’s the first shot across the bow. It escalates rapidly from there.

PETER FALK’S entrance is hysterical. You can’t miss it.

Oh…and three words: WATCH TONY CURTIS.

If this ever gets remade (and I hope it NEVER does), I want a crack at playing NATALIE WOOD’S character MAGGIE DUBOIS.

She’s an overtly feminine, wildly sexy but marvelously outspoken take no prisoners sufragette.

Hmmmm. Can’t even imagine why I’d want to play a part like that…

Lots of mischief to get into this weekend.

Don’t let it overwhelm you before you’re done.

Enjoy…

THE ELEMENTS OF BEAUTY: THE 2009 VERSION

Posted in Beauty on May 2, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

039_3307michelle-pfeiffer-posters
2349381
7136392wk21
richardavedondeneuve2
ca0401
039_11982jane-seymour-posters2
angelina_jolie0806190081
0000259492-26194l1
elizabeth-5
039_9228elizabeth-taylor-posters5b15d5
elizabeth-taylor-708x933-58kb-media
screensirensava
loveavaebay3

In 2008, not long after I created this site, I published an article commenting on PEOPLE’S annual list of the 100 MOST BEAUTIFUL.

For the inevitable contrast, you can find that article here: THE ELEMENTS OF BEAUTY

This whole idea of beauty – and how it fuels and reflects our society – has always intrigued me greatly. Our own biases and preconceptions come into play to a great extent. What thrills us and makes us want to take a second look may completely repel someone else. Many people also have an ideal type that gets them going.

But, of course, looks are rarely the only consideration. You may know realistically that someone is very attractive but may be hard pressed to describe them as beautiful if you can’t stand them. Their character flaws diminish them…and will probably continue to chip away at their lovely facades for as long as you know them.

On the other hand, a nice looking individual that you took little initial notice of may strike you as utterly compelling once you establish a rapport with him/her.

Some beauties are ice cold without an ounce of warmth to redeem them. You may ultimately find that the person that doesn’t even fit the mold of regular attractiveness – but who happens to possess a mesmerizing, powerful sensuality – much more of a headturner.

It’s not always about the gifts that someone was born with.

As for PEOPLE’S compilation…

Well, everyone knows that this list is largely a PR exercise. Always has been. Always will be.

There are individuals that should be nowhere near this list. (This year is no exception.) There are also plenty of cute, pleasantly attractive, good looking or extremely sexy people that make the cut. Some have more than once.

Of course it’s madly subjective…and we all have our biases.

But, to me, being beautiful signifies a loveliness that is absolutely outstanding – someone that is so impossibly gorgeous that they could take your breath away.

PEOPLE does not reveal the entire list. You have to buy the issue (released today) to find out. But I am aware of the majority of their selections.

Let me say – as a woman who loves men – that the lack of spellbinding male presence was staggeringly disappointing. But if this is all I have to work with, I’ll live.

Check out PEOPLE for a page full of related articles. Go here

Regarding PEOPLE’S 2009 MOST BEAUTIFUL, here are the individuals I concur with in alphabetical order:

CHRISTINA APPLEGATE
LORRAINE BRACCO
CHRISTIE BRINKLEY
GEORGE CLOONEY
DAKOTA FANNING
IMAN
ANGELINA JOLIE
NORAH JONES
EVA MENDES
TAYLOR MOMSEN
DEMI MOORE
THANDIE NEWTON
MICHELLE PFEIFFER
BRAD PITT
JANE SEYMOUR
MERYL STREEP
LYNN WHITFIELD

To add to the fun, PEOPLE also has a separate list devoted to 20 CLASSIC BEAUTIES. They had incredible taste when they made these choices…

BRIGITTE BARDOT
CATHERINE DENEUVE
AVA GARDNER
AUDREY HEPBURN
LENA HORNE
GRACE KELLY
VIVIEN LEIGH
SOPHIA LOREN
ALI MacGRAW
DIANA ROSS
ELIZABETH TAYLOR
GENE TIERNEY
RAQUEL WELCH

So feel free to comment on this subject. I definitely welcome it.

I think I’ll make this an annual thing. It’s just too much fun to lay down.

ROBIN WRIGHT TALKS TO FRANCIS FORD COPPOLA IN INTERVIEW MAGAZINE

Posted in Film on April 30, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

robin20wright20penn202

ROBIN WRIGHT is a fascinating woman.

Even when I don’t care for a movie that she appears in, I always like her work. She’s honest and true and she puts herself out there. She’s fearless, does it all without a net and makes it look alarmingly easy.

(If you’ve ever done any acting, you know that it’s not…)

It also doesn’t hurt that she’s stunningly gorgeous in a way that approximates the glamour of old Hollywood.

She’s rather an enigma. Ms. Wright doesn’t talk to the press very often. People that you know little about often acquire a mystique that makes them even more intriguing.

To my amazement, I found an intimate portrait of ROBIN WRIGHT in INTERVIEW magazine. Guess who had the privilege of speaking with her? None other than FRANCIS FORD COPPOLA.

One of my all time favourite directors is engaged in the art of conversation with an actor I’ve long admired? That’s impressive.

In the course of this discussion, Ms. Wright talks about working with ANTHONY MINGHELLA, JUDE LAW, RUSSELL CROWE and REBECCA MILLER.

Here’s a little taste to get you through the night…

FRANCIS: It’s funny, because years ago, when we had Zoetrope up here in San Francisco and we were totally running out of money, my then young colleague George Lucas was saying, ‘You’ve got to get a job, Francis. They’re going to put a chain on the door . . .’

And so I did The Godfather, which was big. It was an industry picture. I don’t even know why they wanted me to do it. But, ironically, that is a film I did only because I had kids and no money and I wanted to survive…and it some how turned out to be artistically well considered.

ROBIN: Ya think, Francis?

I love it…

To get access to this spectactacular interview, please go here

LILITH FAIR RETURNING IN 2010

Posted in Music on April 29, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

apple
fiona_apple_02
sherylcrowcrow11
sheryl-crow

FROM THE CANADIAN PRESS

LILITH FAIR is coming back in 2010.

A spokesperson for the NETTWERK MUSIC GROUP said that the all female concert tour would return next year in the summertime.

NETTWERK’S RICH ADAMS says cofounder SARAH McLACHLAN will be involved in the revived fest, but wouldn’t specify whether it would be in the capacity of performer or organizer.

The touring festival initially ran from 1997 – 1999 and featured only female artists or female led bands, including FIONA APPLE, SHERYL CROW, SINEAD O’CONNOR, QUEEN LATIFAH and THE DIXIE CHICKS.

The festival raised more than $10 million for womens’ charities.

NETTWERK CEO TERRY McBRIDE recently Twittered about the fest, announcing last Friday that it would return and then adding on Saturday: “LILITH FAIR will look at doing two weeks in the U.K./Europe in 2010.”

ON THE NET:

LILITH FAIR

PRINCE DISCUSSES HIS STRUGGLE WITH EPILEPSY

Posted in Music on April 29, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

princeplanet1105_468x509

FROM PEOPLE

What prompted the flashy, eccentric persona that helped make PRINCE legendary in the music world? The singer reveals he was compensating for a painful childhood struggle with epilepsy.

“I’ve never spoken about this before. But I was born epileptic,” the reclusive performer told PBS’ TAVIS SMILEY in an interview on Monday evening.

“I used to have seizures when I was young. My mother and father didn’t know what to do or how to handle it. But they did the best they could with what little they had.”

PRINCE also cites divine intervention for helping him cope with his illness.

“My mother told me one day I walked in to her and said, ‘Mom, I’m not going to be sick any more,’ and she said, ‘Why?’ and I said, ‘Because an angel told me so.’ Now, I don’t remember saying it. That’s just what she told me.”

But his struggle didn’t end there.

“From that point on, I’ve been having to deal with a lot of things – getting teased a lot in school. And early in my career I tried to compensate by being as flashy as I could and as noisy as I could.”

The musician, who is promoting his latest album, the three disc set LOTUSFLOW3R, concluded his two part interview last night.

IT’S WONDERFUL TO BE ADORED…

Posted in Fun on April 28, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

3lee

In a recent interview, actor DENIS LEARY was asked this question: SUPERWOMAN or WONDER WOMAN? Or who strikes your fancy?

DENIS confessed: I’ve always had a thing for CATWOMAN.

Thanks, honey. I’ve always liked you, too…

AYN RAND’S BOOKS & PHILOSOPHIES ALL THE RAGE

Posted in Books, Politics, Publishing on April 28, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

leon600span
annex20-20cooper20gary20fountainhead20the_062
c

FROM CNN

I’ve always been fascinated by architecture.

It would be fabulous to possess the mastery to create things and watch a city take shape under your own personal specifications. Unfortunately, abstract mathematics are not my strong suit.

But being an architect would certainly be a cool profession.

Just as well. There are a variety of things that I’m talented at (mostly artistic) and I’d much rather be pursuing those passions at the end of the day.

This is my way of saying that I adore THE FOUNTAINHEAD. It’s one of the greatest books I’ve ever immersed myself in. I read it a couple of times during my adolescence and never forgot it. My soft cover copy is laying around here somewhere. I should get back to it one of these days.

I haven’t read ATLAS SHRUGGED yet. But AYN RAND was certainly a compellingly captivating woman and one hell of a brilliant writer.

As a person, I’m not sure. Her political views are at least 180 degrees from mine. I’m a liberal. Though I’m certainly all for making money, having a certain amount of success, possessing a grand lifestyle, being self centred (in a healthy way that doesn’t do damage to others) and glorying in individualistic behaviour, you can certainly take any of that too far.

But it certainly is interesting that she’s come back into vogue again. Not terribly surprising, though.

Her vision is sweeping, unique and well articulated. That’s enough to convince some people that it’s the holy grail.

Where is John Galt? reads a sign in the back of a vehicle heading down Interstate 85 in ATLANTA.

AYN RAND is finding new readers thanks to the economic crisis.

That quotation is actually wrong. As any reader of AYN RAND’S ATLAS SHRUGGED can attest, the correct line is WHO IS JOHN GALT?

But the point is well taken.

In the midst of the credit crisis and the federal government’s massive bailout plan, the works of Ms. Rand, a proponent of a libertarian, free market philosophy she called objectivism, are getting new attention.

It’s obviously getting attention from the general public. Sales of her books are “going through the roof,” said YARON BROOK, the president of the AYN RAND INSTITUTE.

According to Mr. Brook, ATLAS SHRUGGED, her most famous novel, has sold more copies in the first four months of 2009 than it did for all of 2008 – and in 2008, it sold 200,000 copies. It’s been in AMAZON’S TOP 50 for more than a month.

Not bad for a 1,100 page doorstop of a book that came out in 1957, by an author who died in 1982.

“So many people see the parallels with what’s actually going on, with the government taking over the banks, with the government kind of taking over the automobile industry, a president who fires the CEO of a major American corporation. These are the kind of things that come out of ATLAS SHRUGGED,” Mr. Brook commented.

Even HOLLYWOOD is said to be interested, which is only fitting, since AYN RAND was once a screenwriter. But developments have come in fits and starts. GODFATHER producer ALBERT S. RUDDY once wanted to make a film and talk of miniseries adaptations emerged in the 70S and 90S.

In 2006, ANGELINA JOLIE was said to have been signed to star as AYN RAND’S hero, rail magnate DAGNY TAGGART and names such as RUSSELL CROWE and BRAD PITT have also been floated. However, as of early 2009, the status of the film remains unknown.

ATLAS SHRUGGED concerns a group of corporate chieftains and individualists who go on strike in protest of government intervention in business. Among those trying to figure out what’s happening are DAGNY TAGGART and steel tycoon HANK REARDEN.

Eventually they meet JOHN GALT, an engineer who had been elevated to legendary status by “stopping the motor of the world” in encouraging other individualists to drop out and who delivers the novel’s showstopping 50 page speech — an expansive summary of Ms. Rand’s philosophy.

Upon the book’s release it divided critics and readers, some of whom praised its message of self sufficiency. More, however, disliked AYN RAND’S politics and atheism, not to mention her writing.

“Is it a novel? Is it a nightmare? Is it SUPERMAN – in the comic strip or the Nietzschean version?” TIME magazine asked in its review, adding that Ms. Rand’s “philosophy must be read to be disbelieved. She deserves credit at least for imagination; unfortunately, it is tied to ludicrous naivety.”

But Ms. Rand’s book — which followed 1943’s THE FOUNTAINHEAD, about a FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT like architect determined to follow his own path – was a best seller and has continued to be significant. In 1991, a LIBRARY OF CONGRESS/BOOK OF THE MONTH CLUB survey named it #2 among respondents’ most influential books, after the Bible.

Her philosophy of selfishness and her love of pure capitalism (she used to wear a dollar sign brooch) has earned her many followers, particularly on the right.

But her critics are equally fervent, questioning her belief in pure free markets.

“What I find so remarkable about it is, if capitalism can work on its own without any government regulation, then we wouldn’t be here,” said economist HEATHER BOUSHEY of the left leaning CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS.

THE RAND INSTITUTE’S YARON BROOK points out that, to Ms. Rand, selfishness did not mean disengagement from the world or sociopathy.

“Rational self interest, egotism, in AYN RAND’S perception is not thinking short term and satisfying just whims…and cheating and lying and stealing,” he remarked.

“It is about pursuing what’s truly in your rational, long term self interest, figuring out what’s good for you, without exploiting, taking advantage, without stealing from other people, without sacrificing from other people to yourself.”

“But also,” he added, “without sacrificing yourself to other people.”

It’s that debate over shared sacrifice that will likely continue to fuel Ms. Rand’s critics, as well as her admirers. At book stores, it will likely keep cash registers ringing, which could only have made the dollar sign wearing author very happy indeed.

MOVIE STARS THAT DIE ON SCREEN…

Posted in Film on April 28, 2009 by Miranda Wilding

pacino
nicholson

Obviously, spoilers throughout….

If you don’t want to know, then don’t read any further.

I’ve thought a lot about this since I began viewing films as a tiny girl. Why is it that some prominent performers portray characters that die…ALL THE TIME???

Personally, I can’t think of anything that’s creepier. I wouldn’t want to play anyone that met their demise unless it was a truly exceptional part. Like a real person that was incredibly interesting.

But PREMIERE has a list of great actors (all men…) that have died for their art consistently. I don’t think that I’ve ever seen an article that explored this fully.

So I’ll just go through the list and discuss the men and the films that I have a reasonable fondness for….

DUSTIN HOFFMAN – 9 TIMES
BILLY BATHGATE

JACK NICHOLSON – 9 TIMES
BATMAN, HOFFA, THE DEPARTED

AL PACINO – 9 TIMES
SCARFACE, DICK TRACY, THE GODFATHER PART III, DONNIE BRASCO, INSOMNIA

BRAD PITT – 9 TIMES
A RIVER RUNS THROUGH IT, TROY, THE ASSASSINATION OF JESSE JAMES BY THE COWARD ROBERT FORD, THE CURIOUS CASE OF BENJAMIN BUTTON

And the champ…

ROBERT DENIRO – 14 TIMES
BANG THE DRUM SLOWLY, MEAN STREETS, BRAZIL, THIS BOY’S LIFE, JACKIE BROWN, GREAT EXPECTATIONS

To access the article, please go here